A Practical Comparison of Three
Tetrahedral Ambisonic Microphones
SAMPLE FILES RELATED TO AES_126 PAPER 7676
home button
next button
The files on this site are related to a paper I presented at the 126th Audio Engineering Society Conference in Munich, Germany in May, 2009. Permission for the use of these files is granted for educational use only, with credits appreciated. Permission is not granted for republication in any form, although links to this page are permitted. Please do not link directly to the files as they are subject to location changes.

The paper, titled A Practical Comparison of Three Tetrahedral Ambisonic Microphones, discusses the microphones (an experimental microphone, a Sound Core TetraMic, and either a Soundfield MkV or SPS422B) and equipment chosen to make these recordings and the results of two listener surveys, each comparing segments of different recordings made simultaneously with the three microphones. Listeners were asked to play the recordings in a location and on equipment with which each was familiar. Typically, that was their home audio system. The survey was not an attempt to determine which microphone was "the best," rather, to gather critical subjective analysis about what they heard, or did not hear, from the different microphones. The survey respondents concluded that the experimental mic and Soundfield tied as "favorites."

Hard copies of the paper were available for distribution at the AES Convention in Munich. The paper is currently available online and via download as a pdf. Click AES_126_7676 to view or download the paper.
Photograph of Dan's Experimental Tetrahedral Microphone
Photograph of a Core-Sound TetraMic
Photograph of a Soundfield MkV microphone
Experimental Mic
Core Sound TetraMic
Soundfield MkV and SPS422B
This website is constructed and maintained by
Dan Hemingson.
Comments may be sent to dhemingson@mail.utexas.edu.